約 5,561,348 件
https://w.atwiki.jp/aniwotawiki/pages/34865.html
登録日:2016/07/27 Wed 22 20 22 更新日:2022/06/20 Mon 09 51 32NEW! 所要時間:約 5 分で読めます ▽タグ一覧 MS Microsoft PC Surface Windows アニヲタIT教室 コンピューター タブレット タブレットPC ノートパソコン パソコン マイクロソフト リファレンスモデル Microsoft Surfaceとは、米国マイクロソフト(以下MS)が製造・発売しているWindowsPCのシリーズである。 Android端末でいう「Nexusシリーズに相当する、いわゆる「リファレンスモデル」という立ち位置のシリーズ。 どうでもいい話だが、本項目はSurface3で作成している。 概要 MSが製造・発売しているWindowsタブレット/ノートPCのシリーズ。 タブレットタイプの「Surface」「Surface Pro」、ノートPCタイプの「Surface Book」が存在している。 製造はNexusのように外部のメーカーに委託するのではなく、MSが自社で行っている(中国に工場があるらしい)。 エントリーモデルの「Surface3」で日本円にして約7万円台後半からと、Windowsタブレットとしては決して安いとはいえない価格帯ではあるが、 「Windowsタブレットとしてはかなり高速なCPUを採用している」(Surface3でAtomシリーズの最速モデル、ProではCoreシリーズ)、 「(Pro/Bookは)PCゲームにも耐えうる性能を持ちながら携帯性も優れている」などの点を考えれば、むしろ割りとお買い得なシリーズなのではないかと思う。 (何も考えずに家電量販店に行って買えるようなマシンだと、RAMが2GBでフラッシュが32GBなんてのもザラだし…) Windowsタブレットとしてはマシンパワーはかなり余裕が有る方であり、エントリーモデルのSurface3でもYouTubeのHD動画やニコニコ動画をそれなりに快適に視聴できるし、 4K動画の再生もそこそこスムーズである(スマホで撮影した動画で確認)。 ただしSurface3では「4K/60fps」はさすがに厳しいようであり、「1080p/60fps」か「4K/30fps」で我慢しよう。 ゲームに関してはPro/Bookでは言わずもがなであるが、通常のSurfaceでもブラウザゲームなら割と快適に動くという証言もある(艦これも快適にプレイ出来たとの証言あり)。モバイルルーターと組み合わせればどこでも提督できるぞ。 インターフェイス USB 高速転送が可能なUSB3.0規格を採用。 電源端子 Surfaceに電源を供給する。 ProシリーズとSurface2までは専用の特殊な電源端子が、Surface3ではMicroUSB端子が採用されている。 MiniDisplayPort 外部ディスプレイを接続する時に使用する、小型のDisplayPort。 変換アダプタを使えばフルサイズのDPや、あるいはHDMI端子でも行ける。 ヘッドホンジャック ヘッドホンを接続する端子。 MicroSDカードスロット 記憶領域として使えるSDカードスロット。 SDXC規格に対応している。 SIMスロット(Surface3のみ) LTE通信用のSIMを装着する。 規格はnanoSIM。 シリーズ Surface(無印) 元祖Surface。形態はタブレット。 CPU…というかSoC(中枢部のチップ)にはnVidiaの「Tegra」を採用している(Nexus9とかに使われているやつ)。 このモデルのみOSに「Windows RT」というモバイル機器向けの特殊なWindowsを採用している。 ま、アップデートでWin8.1になったんですが。 電源端子は磁気式の特殊な形状のコネクター。 Surface Pro Surfaceの上位モデル。 こちらは無印と違い、一般的なWindowsPCに使われているCoreシリーズがCPUとして採用されている。 そのため一般的なデスクトップ/ノートPCと同じように使える。 Surface2 Surfaceの二代目。このモデルからCPUがAtomになり、フル規格のWindowsが動くようになった。 電源端子は同じく磁気式の特殊なコネクタ。 Surface Pro 2 Surface Proの第二世代モデル。 CPUが新設計のものとなり、画面のピクセル数も強化された。 Surface Pro 3 Surface Proの第三世代モデル。 CPUが(ry、画面の(ry。 Surface Pro 4 Surface Proの(ry CPU(ry Surface 3 Surfaceの第三世代。 CPUはAtomの最新バージョン、しかも最速のx7シリーズ(一説にはCore2 Duo並の性能とされている)を採用しているため、「Atom機=低性能」と思っていると結構面くらう。 電源端子はMicroUSB(通信対応)となり、電源の自由度が大幅に向上した。スマホ用のモバイルバッテリーでも(出力2A以上のものであれば)充電できる。筆者はこのお陰でProが選択肢から外れた。 また4G LTEに対応したモデルもラインナップに加わっている。 SIMフリー端末ではあるが、日本国内で動作が確認されているのは公式にはY!Mobile回線のみ。 でもドコモやauのLTE回線でもまあ使える…とは思う。(筆者は未検証) 後継モデルに関しては、どーもIntelがAtomシリーズの新製品開発をやめるんじゃないかという噂が立っており、 「終了のお知らせ」かあるいはスマホで猛威を振るっているARM系SoC「SnapDragon」シリーズを採用しコンセプトも少し変わるんじゃないか、とも噂されている。 Surface Book ノートPCタイプのSurface。 簡単に言うと「画面を外してタブレットとしても使えるノートPC」。 独立したGPUを搭載するなどシリーズでもかなりの高性能機となっているが、その分お値段も高め(日本円で約20万円より)。 主なオプション タイプカバー 画面保護用のカバー兼キーボード。 これがあると無いでは使い勝手が信じられないくらい違う。 なんだかんだ言ってもWindowsはキーボードあるのが前提のOSである。 Surfaceペン スタイラス。 ペンタブレット並の細やかな筆圧・角度検知能力を備えている。 ただし電源は単6電池と特殊。 ACアダプタ/充電ケーブル Surfaceに電源を供給する。 充電ケーブルの接続部は通電中には白色LEDが点灯する。 アークマウス 曲げてマウスの形にすると電源がONになる。 追記・修正さえあれば、何もいらない。 △メニュー 項目変更 この項目が面白かったなら……\ポチッと/ -アニヲタWiki- ▷ コメント欄 [部分編集] 丸めたり、折り畳みすることのできるタブレット、出ないかなぁ…… -- 名無しさん (2016-07-28 07 12 47) ↑それもうタブレットちゃうやん…一応紙のように丸めるディスプレイは既に開発されているので、そう遠くない未来出ると思われ -- 名無しさん (2016-07-28 12 21 14) CM曲のネガチェンジャラガーってフレーズが妙に耳に残ってるわ -- 名無しさん (2016-07-28 19 49 35) 名前 コメント
https://w.atwiki.jp/dqwiki/pages/18.html
どんな周辺機器が必要か DQ10の動作環境とSurface Pro 2を比較すると、以下の通り。動作環境にはこの他にDirectXやShaderModel、インターネット接続ブラウザもあるが、別途購入する必要のないソフトウェアであるため、ここでは省略する。 DQ10必須動作環境 DQ10推奨動作環境 Surface Pro 2の場合 OS Windows Vista/7/8 Windows 7/8 最初から入っている CPU Core2Duo 1.6GHz相当以上 Core i5 2.4GHz以上 最初から入っている メインメモリ 2GB以上 4GB以上 最初から入っている HDD/SSD 空き容量16GB以上 同左 最初から入っている グラフィックカード Intel HD Graphics 2000以上 Geforce GT 640M以上 最初から入っている サウンドカード DirectSound互換サウンドカード 同左 最初から入っている 通信環境 常時接続必須 同左 別途必要 その他 キーボード、マウス キーボード、マウス、ゲームパッド キーボードとゲームパッドが別途必要 DQ10のパッケージ版を購入する場合は、DVD-ROMで提供されるため、DVD-ROMを読み込み可能な外付けドライブも必要。 Surface Pro 2は画面タッチによりマウス操作相当が可能であり、DQ10の起動後の操作はゲームコントローラなどで行えるため、マウスは無くてもよい。 図にはUSBメモリを記載しているが、これはSurface Pro 2の初期設定のページに示す回復ドライブを作成するためのものであり、DQ10動作時は接続しなくてよい。 通信環境 既に無線LAN(Wi-Fi)によって他のPCやゲーム機などがインターネットに接続できるようになっているならば、その無線LANにSurface Pro 2も参加させればよい。 テザリング機能を持つスマートフォンを持っているならば、パケット料金への注意は必要だが、テザリング機能によってスマートフォンをモバイルルータとして利用可能。 ゲームコントローラ(ゲームパッド) 「あると便利」という扱いだが、実際にはほぼ必須 コントローラに要求されるボタン数アナログジョイスティック×2 ボタン×12 家庭用ゲーム機のコントローラが余っているならばそれをPCで使用するためのコンバータを使ってもよい エレコム ゲームパッドコンバータ USB接続 Wii クラシックコントローラ対応 1ポート ホワイト JC-W01UWH【ドラゴンクエストX 動作確認済】 クラシックコントローラ PRO(シロ) キーボード Wii版/WiiU版DQ10とは異なり、Windows版DQ10はキーボードありを前提に作られている USBポートが1つしかないため、ゲームコントローラと同時にキーボードを使用する方法は以下のいずれか TypeCover2(4色)やTouchCover2(1色のみ)を専用ポートに接続する bluetoothキーボードを使う USBキーボードを接続するこの場合、ゲームコントローラはbluetoothで接続する USBハブを使ってUSBポートの数を増やし、USBキーボードとUSBゲームコントローラを使用する電源のない環境で使用する場合、USBハブはバスパワー動作(USBハブの動作に必要な電源をPCのUSBポートから得る)に対応していること マイクロソフト Type Cover 2 N7W-00089 [マゼンタピンク] マイクロソフト 【純正】Surface 2/Pro 2兼用 Touch Cover 2 (ブラック) N3W-00086 マイクロソフト キーボード Bluetooth対応/ワイヤレス/小型/テンキーレス - Wedge Mobile Keyboard U6R-00022
https://w.atwiki.jp/counterattack/pages/51.html
Surface Trouble 解禁できるアタッチメント ウェーブクラッシャー ミニショックウェーブ 武器優先志向 イオンビーム NEXT Level Outpost Ginga PREV Level Lone Ship
https://w.atwiki.jp/matchmove/pages/78.html
Stabilization In this section, we’ll go into SynthEyes’ stabilization system in depth, and describe some of the nifty things that can be done with it. If we wanted, we could have a single button “Stabilize this!” that would quickly and reliably do a bad job almost all the time. If that s what you’re looking for, there are some other software packages that will be happy to oblige. In SynthEyes, we have provided a rich toolset to get outstanding results in a wide variety of situations. You might wonder why we’ve buried such a wonderful and significant capability quite so far into the manual. The answer is simple in the hopes that you’ve actually read some of the manual, because effectively using the stabilizer will require that you know a number of SynthEyes concepts, and how to use the SynthEyes tracking capabilities. If this is the first section of the manual that you’re reading, great, thanks for reading this, but you’ll probably need to check out some of the other sections too. At the least, you have to read the Stabilization quick-start. Also, be sure to check the web site for the latest tutorials on stabilization. We apologize in advance for some of the rant content of the following sections, but it s really in your best interest! Why SynthEyes Has a Stabilizer The simple and ordinary need for stabilization arises when you are presented with a shot that is bouncing all over the place, and you need to clean it up into a solid professional-looking shot. That may be all that is needed, or you might need to track it and add 3-D effects also. Moving-camera shots can be challenging to shoot, so having software stabilization can make life easier. Or, you may have some film scans which are to be converted to HD or SD TV resolution, and effects added. People of all skill levels have been using a variety of ad-hoc approaches to address these tasks, sometimes using software designed for this, and sometimes using or abusing compositing software. Sometimes, presumably, this all goes well. But many times it does not a variety of problem shots have been sent to SynthEyes tech support which are just plain bad. You can look at them and see they have been stabilized, and not in a good way. We have developed the SynthEyes stabilizer not only to stabilize shots, but to try to ensure that it is done the right way. How NOT to Stabilize Though it is relatively easy to rig up a node-based compositor to shift footage back and forth to cancel out a tracked motion, this creates a fundamental problem Most imaging software, including you, expects the optic center of an image to fall at the center of that image. Otherwise, it looks weird—the fundamental camera geometry is broken. The optic center might also be called the vanishing point, center of perspective, back focal point, center of lens distortion. For example, think of shooting some footage out of the front of your car as you drive down a highway. Now cut off the right quarter of all the images and look at the sequence. It will be 4 3 footage, but it s going to look strange—the optic center is going to be off to the side. If you combine off-center footage with additional rendered elements, they will have the optic axis at their center, and combined with the different center of the original footage, they will look even worse. So when you stabilize by translating an image in 2-D (and usually zooming a little), you’ve now got an optic center moving all over the place. Right at the point you’ve stabilized, the image looks fine, but the corners will be flying all over the place. It s a very strange effect, it looks funny, and you can’t track it right. If you don’t know what it is, you’ll look at it, and think it looks funny but not know what has hit you. Recommendation if you are going to be adding effects to a shot, you should ask to be the one to stabilize or pan/scan it also. We’ve given you the tool to do it well, and avoid mishap. That s always better than having someone else mangle it, and having to explain later why the shot has problems, or why you really need the original un-stabilized source by yesterday. In-Camera Stabilization Many cameras now feature built-in stabilization, using a variety of operating principles. These stabilizers, while fine for shooting baby s first steps, may not be fine at all for visual effects work. Electronic stabilization uses additional rows and columns of pixels, then shifts the image in 2-D, just like the simple but flawed 2-D compositing approach. These are clearly problematic. One type of optical stabilizer apparently works by putting the camera imaging CCD chip on a little platform with motors, zipping the camera chip around rapidly so it catches the right photons. As amazing as this is, it is clearly just the 2-D compositing approach. Another optical stabilizer type adds a small moving lens in the middle of the collection of simple lens comprising the overall zoom lens. Most likely, the result is equivalent to a 2-D shift in the image plane. A third type uses prismatic elements at the front of the lens. This is more likely to be equivalent to re-aiming the camera, and thus less hazardous to the image geometry. Doubtless additional types are in use and will appear, and it is difficult to know their exact properties. Some stabilizers seem to have a tendency to intermittently jump when confronted with smooth motions. One mitigating factor for in-camera stabilizers, especially electronic, is that the total amount of offset they can accommodate is small—the less they can correct, the less they can mess up. Recommendation It is probably safest to keep camera stabilization off when possible, and keep the shutter time (angle) short to avoid blur, except when the amount of light is limited. Electronic stabilizers have trouble with limited light so that type might have to be off anyway. 3-D Stabilization To stabilize correctly, you need 3-D stabilization that performs “keystone correction” (like a projector does), re-imaging the source at an angle. In effect, your source image is projected onto a screen, then re-shot by a new camera looking in a somewhat different direction with a smaller field of view. Using a new camera keeps the optic center at the center of the image. In order to do this correctly, you always have to know the field of view of the original camera. Fortunately, SynthEyes can tell us that. Stabilization Concepts Point of Interest (POI). The point of interest is the fixed point that is being stabilized. If you are pegging a shot, the point of interest is the one point on the image that never moves. POI Deltas (Adjust tab). These values allow you to intentionally move the POI around, either to help reduce the amount of zoom required, or to achieve a particular framing effect. If you create a rotation, the image rotates around the POI. Stabilization Track. This is roughly the path the POI took—it is a direction in 3-D space, described by pan/tilt/roll angles—basically where the camera (POI) was looking (except that the POI isn’t necessarily at the center of the image). Reference Track. This is the path in 3-D we want the POI to take. If the shot is pegged, then this track is just a single set of values, repeated for the duration of the shot. Separate Field of View Track. The image preparation system has its own field of view track. The image prep s FOV will be larger than main FOV, because the image prep system sees the entire input image, while the main tracking and solving works only on the smaller stabilized sub-window output by image prep. Note that an image prep FOV is needed only for stabilization, not for pixel-level adjustments, downsampling, etc. The Get Solver FOV button transfers the main FOV track to the stabilizer. Separate Distortion Track. Similarly there is a separate lens distortion track. The image prep s distortion can be animated, while the main distortion can not. The image prep distortion or the main distortion should always be zero, they should never both be nonzero simultaneously. The Get Solver Distort button transfers the main distortion value (from solving or the Lens-panel alignment lines) to the stabilizer, and begs you to let it clear the main distortion value afterwards. Stabilization Zoom. The output window can only be a portion of the size of the input image. The more jiggle, the smaller the output portion must be, to be sure that it does not run off the edge of the input (see the Padded mode of the image prep window to see this in action). The zoom factor reflects the ratio of the input and output sizes, and also what is happening to the size of a pixel. At a zoom ratio of 1, the input and output windows and pixels are the same size. At a zoom ratio of 2, the output is half the size of the input, and each incoming pixel has to be stretched to become two pixels in the output, which will look fairly blurry. Accordingly, you want to keep the zoom value down in the 1.1-1.3 region. After an Auto-scale, you can see the required zoom on the Adjust panel. Re-sampling. There s nothing that says we have to produce the same size image going out as coming in. The Output tab lets you create a different output format, though you will have to consider what effect it has on image quality. Re-sampling 3K down to HD sounds good; but re-sampling DV up to HD will come out blurry because the original picture detail is not there. Interpolation Filter. SynthEyes has to create new pixels “in-between” the existing ones. It can do so with different kinds of filtering to prevent aliasing, ranging from the default Bi-Linear to the most complex 3-Lanczos. The bi-linear filter is fastest but produces the softest image. The Lanczos filters take longer, but are sharper—although this can be drawback if the image is noisy. Tracker Paths. One or more trackers are combined to form the stabilization track. The tracker s 2-D paths follow the original footage. After stabilization, they will not match the new stabilized footage. There is a button, Apply to Trkers, that adjusts the tracker paths to match the new footage, but again, they then match that particular footage and they must be restored to match the original footage (with Remove f/Trkers) before making any later changes to the stabilization. If you mess up, you either have to return to an earlier saved file, or re-track. Overall Process We’re ready to walk through the stabilization process. You may want to refer to the Image Preprocessor Reference. · Track the features required for stabilization either a full auto-track, supervised tracking of particular features to be stabilized, or a combination. · If possible, solve the shot either for full 3-D or as a tripod shot, even if it is not truly nodal. The resulting 3-D point locations will make the stabilization more accurate, and it is the best way to get an accurate field of view. · If you have not solved the shot, manually set the Lens FOV on the Image Preprocessor s Lens tab (not the main Lens panel) to the best available value. If you do set up the main lens FOV, you can import it to the Lens tab. · On the Stabilization tab, select a stabilization mode for translation and/or rotation. This will build the stabilization track automatically if there isn’t one already (as if the Get Tracks button was hit), and import the lens FOV if the shot is solved. · Adjust the frequency spinner as desired. · Hit the Auto-Scale button to find the required stabilization zoom · Check the zoom on the Adjust tab; using the Padded view, make any additional adjustment to the stabilization activity to minimize the required zoom, or achieve desired shot framing. · Output the shot. If only stabilized footage is required, you are done. · Update the scene to use the new imagery, and either re-track or update the trackers to account for the stabilization · Get a final 3-D or tripod solve and export to your animation or compositing package for further effects work. There are two main kinds of shots and stabilization for them shots focusing on a subject, which is to remain in the frame, and traveling shots, where the content of the image changes as new features are revealed. Stabilizing on a Subject Often a shot focuses on a single subject, which we want to stabilize in the frame, despite the shaky motion of the camera. Example shots of this type include · The camera person walking towards a mark on the ground, to be turned into a cliff edge for a reveal. · A job site to receive a new building, shot from a helicopter orbiting overhead · A camera car driving by a house, focusing on the house. To stabilize these shots, you will identify or create several trackers in the vicinity of the subject, and with them selected, select the Peg mode on the Translation list on the Stabilize tab. This will cause the point of interest to remain stationary in the image for the duration of the shot. You may also stabilize and peg the image rotation. Almost always, you will want to stabilize rotation. It may or may not be pegged. You may find it helpful to animate the stabilized position of the point of interest, in order to minimize the zoom required, see below, and also to enliven a shot somewhat. Some car commercials are shot from a rig that shows both the car and the surrounding countryside as the car drives they look a bit surreal because the car is completely stationary—having been pegged exactly in place. No real camera rig is that perfect! Stabilizing a Traveling Shot Other shots do not have a single subject, but continue to show new imagery. For example, · A camera car, with the camera facing straight ahead · A forward-facing camera in a helicopter flying over terrain · A camera moving around the corner of a house to reveal the backyard behind it In such shots, there is no single feature to stabilize. Select the Filter mode for the stabilization of translation and maybe rotation. The result is similar to the stabilization done in-camera, though in SynthEyes you can control it and have keystone correction. When the stabilizer is filtering, the Cut Frequency spinner is active. Any vibratory motion below that frequency (in cycles per second) is preserved, and vibratory motion above that frequency is greatly reduced or eliminated. You should adjust the spinner based on the type of motion present, and the degree of stabilization required. A camera mounted on a car with a rigid mount, such as a StickyPod, will have only higher-frequency residual vibration, and a larger value can be used. A hand-held shot will often need a frequency around 0.5 Hz to be smooth. Note When using filter-mode stabilization, the length of the shot matters. If the shot is too short, it is not possible to accurately control the frequency and distinguish between vibration and the desired motion, especially at the beginning and end of the shot. Using a longer version of the take will allow more control, even if much of the stabilized shot is cut after stabilization. Minimizing Zoom The more zoom required to stabilize a shot, the less image quality will result, which is clearly bad. Can we minimize the zoom, and maximize image quality? Of course, and SynthEyes provides the controllability to do so. Stabilizing a shot has considerable flexibility the shot can be stable in lots of different ways, with different amounts of zoom required. We want a shot that everyone agrees is stable, but minimizes the effect on quality. Fortunately, we have the benefit of foresight, so we can correct a problem in the middle of a shot, anticipating it long before it occurs, and provide an apparently stable result. Animating POI The basic technique is to animate the position of the point-of-interest within the frame. If the shot bumps left suddenly, there are fewer pixels available on the left side of the point of interest to be able to maintain its relative position in the output image, and a higher zoom will be required. If we have already moved the point of interest to the left, fewer pixels are required, and less zoom is required. Earlier, in the Stabilization Quick Start, we remarked that the 28% zoom factor obtained by animating the rotation could be reduced further. We’ll continue that example here to show how. Re-do the quick start to completion, go to frame 178, with the Adjust tab open, in Padded display mode, with the make key button turned on. From the display, you can see that the red output-area rectangle is almost near the edge of the image. Grab the purple point-of-interest crosshair, and drag the red rectangle up into the middle of the image. Now everything is a lot safer. If you switch to the stabilize tab and hit Autoscale, the red rectangle enlarges—there is less zoom, as the Adjust tab shows. Only 15% zoom is now required. By dragging the POI/red rectangle, we reduced zoom. You can see that what we did amounted to moving the POI. Hit Undo twice, and switch to the Final view. Drag the POI down to the left, until the Delta U/V values are approximately 0.045 and -0.035. Switch back to the Padded view, and you’ll see you’ve done the same thing as before. The advantage of the padded view is that you can more easily see what you are doing, though you can get a similar effect in the Final view by increasing the margin to about 0.25, where you can see the dashed outline of the source image. If you close the Image Prep dialog and play the shot, you will see the effect of moving the POI a very stable shot, though the apparent subject changes over time. It can make for a more interesting shot and more creative decisions. Too Much of a Good Thing? To be most useful, you can scrub through your shot and look for the worst frame, where the output rectangle has the most missing, and adjust the POI position on that frame. After you do that, there will be some other frame which is now the worst frame. You can go and adjust that too, if you want. As you do this, the zoom required will get less and less. There is a downside as you do this, you are creating more of the shakiness you are trying to get rid of. If you keep going, you could get back to no zoom required, but all the original shakiness, which is of course senseless. Usually, you will only want to create two or three keys at most, unless the shot is very long. But exactly where you stop is a creative decision based on the allowable shakiness and quality impact. Auto-Scale Capabilities The auto-scale button can automate the adjustment process for you, as controlled by the Animate listbox and Maximum auto-zoom settings. With Animate set to Neither, Auto-scale will pick the smallest zoom required to avoid missing pieces on the output image sequence, up to the specified maximum value. If that maximum is reached, there will be missing sections. If you change the Animate setting to Translate, though, Auto-scale will automatically add delta U/V keys, animating the POI position, any time the zoom would have to exceed the maximum. Rewind to the beginning of the shot, and control-right-click the Delta-U spinner, clearing all the position keys. Change the Animate setting to Translate, reduce the Maximum auto-zoom to 1.1, then click Auto-Scale. SynthEyes adds several keys to achieve the maximum 10% zoom. If you play back the sequence, you will see the shot shifting around a bit—10% is probably too low given the amount of jitter in the shot to begin with. The auto-scale button can also animate the zoom track, if enabled with the Animate setting. The result is equivalent to a zooming camera lens, and you must be sure to note that in the main lens panel setting if you will 3-D solve the shot later. This is probably only useful when there is a lot of resolution available to begin with, and the point of interest approaches the boundary of the image at the end of the shot. Keep in mind that the Auto-scale functionality is relatively simple. By considering the purpose of the shot as well as the nature of any problems in it, you should often be able to do better. Tweaking the Point of Interest This is different than moving it! When the selected trackers are combined to form the single overall stabilization track, SynthEyes examines the weight of each tracker, as controlled from the main Tracker panel. This allows you to shift the position of the point-of-interest (POI) within a group of trackers, which can be handy. Suppose you want to stabilize at the location of a single tracker, but you want to stabilize the rotation as well. With a single tracker, rotation can not be stabilized. If you select two trackers, you can stabilize the rotation, but without further action, the point of interest will be sitting between the two trackers, not at the location of the one you care about. To fix this, select the desired POI tracker in the main viewport, and increase its weight value to the maximum (currently 10). Then, select the other tracker(s), and reduce the weight to the minimum (0.050). This will put the POI very close to your main tracker. If you play with the weights a bit, you can make the POI go anywhere within a polygon formed by the trackers. But do not be surprised if the resulting POI seems to be sliding on the image the POI is really a 3-D location, and usually the combination of the trackers will not be on the surface (unless they are all in the same plane). If this is a problem for what you want to do, you should create a supervised tracker at the desired POI location and use that instead. If you have adjusted the weights, and later want to re-solve the scene, you should set the weights back to 1.0 before solving. (Select them all then set the weight to 1). Resampling and Film to HDTV Pan/Scan Workflow If you are working with filmed footage, often you will need to pull the actual usable area from the footage the scan is probably roughly 4 3, but the desired final output is 16 9 or 1.85 or even 2.35, so only part of the filmed image will be used. A director may select the desired portion to achieve a desired framing for the shot. Part of the image may be vignetted and unusable. The image must be cropped to pull out the usable portion of the image with the correct aspect ratio. This cropping operation can be performed as the film is scanned, so that only the desired framing is scanned; clearly this minimizes the scan time and disk storage. But, there is an important reason to scan the entire frame instead. The optic center must remain at the center of the image. If the scanning is done without paying attention, it may be off center, and almost certainly will be if the framing is driven by directorial considerations. If the entire frame is scanned, or at least most of it, then you can use SynthEyes s stabilization software to perform keystone correction, and produce properly centered footage. As a secondary benefit, you can do pan and scan operations to stabilize the shots, or achieve moving framing that would be difficult to do during scanning. With the more complete scan, the final decision can be deferred or changed later in production. The Output tab on the Image Preparation controls resampling, allowing you to output a different image format then that coming in. The incoming resolution should be at least as large as the output resolution, for example, a 3K 4 3 film scan for a 16 9 HDTV image at 1920x1080p. This will allow enough latitude to pull out smaller subimages. If you are resampling from a larger resolution to a smaller one, you should use the Blur setting to minimize aliasing effects (Moire bands). You should consider the effect of how much of the source image you are using before blurring. If you have a zoom factor of 2 into a 3K shot, the effective pixel count being used is only 1.5K, so you probably would not blur if you are producing 1920x1080p HD. Due to the nature of SynthEyes’ integrated image preparation system, the re-sampling, keystone correction, and lens un-distortion all occur simultaneously in the same pass. This presents a vastly improved situation compared to a typical node-based compositor, where the image will be resampled and degraded at each stage. Changing Shots, and Creating Motion in Stills You can use the stabilization system to adjust framing of shots in post-production, or to create motion from still images (the Ken Burns effect). To use the stabilizing engine you have to be stabilizing, so simply animating the Delta controls will not let you pan and scan without the following trick. Delete any the trackers, click the Get Tracks button, and then turn on the Translation channel of the stabilizer. This turns on the stabilizer, making the Delta channels work, without doing any actual stabilization. You must enter a reasonable estimate of the lens field of view. If it is a moving-camera or tripod-mode shot, you can track it first to determine the field of view. Remember to delete the trackers before beginning the mock stabilization. If you are working from a still, you can use the single-frame alignment tool to determine the field of view. You will need to use a text editor to create an IFL file that contains the desired number of copies of your original file name. Stabilization and Interlacing Interlaced footage presents special problems for stabilization, because jitter in the positioning between the two fields is equivalent to jitter in camera position, which we’re trying to remove. Because the two different fields are taken at different points in time (1/30th or 1/25th of a second apart, regardless of shutter time), it is impossible for man or machine to determine what exactly happened, in general. Stabilizing interlaced footage will sacrifice a factor of two in vertical resolution. Best Approach if at all possible, shoot progressive instead of interlace footage. This is a good rule whenever you expect to add effects to a shot. Fallback Approach stabilize slow-moving interlaced shots as if they were progressive. Stabilize rapidly-moving interlaced shots as interlaced. To stabilize interlaced shots, SynthEyes stabilizes each sequence of fields independently. Note that within the image preparation subsystem, some animated tracks are animated by the field, and some are animated by the frame. Frame levels, color/hue, distortion/scale, ROI Field FOV, cut frequency, Delta U/V, Delta Rot, Delta Zoom When you are animating a frame-animated item on an interlaced shot, if you set a key on one field (say 10), you will see the same key on the other field (say 11). This simplifies the situation, at least on these items, if you change a shot from interlaced to progressive or “yes” mode or back. Avoid Slowdowns Due to Missing Keyframes While you are working on stabilizing a shot, you will be re-fetching frames from the source imagery fairly often, especially when you scrub through a shot to check the stabilization. If the source imagery is a QuickTime or AVI that does not have many (or any!) keyframes, random access into the shot will be slow, since the codec will have to decompress all the frames from the last keyframe to get to the one that is needed. This can require repeatedly decompressing the entire shot. It is not a SynthEyes problem, or even specific to stabilizing, but is a problem with the choice of codec settings. If this happens (and it is not uncommon), you should save the movie as an image sequence (with no stabilization), and Shot/Change Shot Images to that version instead. Alternatively, you may be able to assess the situation using the Padded display, turning the update mode to Neither, then scrubbing through the shot. After Stabilizing Once you’ve finished stabilizing the shot, you should write it back out to disk using the Save Sequence button on the Output tab. It is also possible to save the sequence through the Perspective window s Preview Movie capability. Each method has its advantages, but using the Save Sequence button will be generally better for this purpose it is faster; does less to the images; allows you to write the 16 bit version; and allows you to write the alpha channel. However, it does not overlay inserted test objects like the Preview Movie does. You can use the stabilized footage you write for downstream applications such as 3dsmax and Maya. But before you export the camera path and trackers from SynthEyes, you have a little more work to do. The tracker and camera paths in SynthEyes correspond to the original footage, not the stabilized footage, and they are substantially different. Once you close the Image Preparation dialog, you’ll see that the trackers are doing one thing, and the now-stable image doing something else. You should always save the stabilizing SynthEyes scene file at this point for future use in the event of changes. You can then do a File/New, open the stabilized footage, track it, then export the 3-D scene matching the stabilized footage. But… if you have already done a full 3-D track on the original footage, you can save time. Click the Apply to Trkers button on the Output tab. This will apply the stabilization data to the existing trackers. When you close the Image Prep, the 2-D tracker locations will line up correctly, though the 3-D X s will not yet. Go to the solver panel, and re-solve the shot (Go!), and the 3-D positions and camera path will line up correctly again. (If you really wanted to, you could probably use Seed Points mode to speed up this re-solve.) Important if you later decide you want to change the stabilization parameters without re-tracking, you must not have cleared the stabilizer. Hit the Remove f/Trkers button BEFORE making any changes, to get back to the original tracking data. Otherwise, if you Apply twice, or Remove after changes, you will just create a mess. Also, the Blip data is not changed by the Apply or Remove buttons, and it is not possible to Peel any blip trails, which correspond to the original image coordinates, after completing stabilization and hitting Apply. So you must either do all peeling first; remove, peel, and reapply the stabilization; or retrack later if necessary. Flexible Workflows Suppose you have written out a stabilized shot, and adjusted the tracker positions to match the new shot. You can solve the shot, export it, and play around with it in general. If you need to, you can pop the stabilization back off the trackers, adjust the stabilization, fix the trackers back up, and re-solve, all without going back to earlier scene files and thus losing later work. That s the kind of flexibility we like. There s only one slight drawback each time you save and close the file, then reopen it, you’re going to have to wait while the image prep system recomputes the stabilized image. That might be only a few seconds, or it might be quite a while for a long film shot. It s pretty stupid, when you consider that you’ve already written the complete stabilized shot to disk! Approach 1 do a Shot/Change Shot Images to the saved stabilized shot, and reset the image prep system from the Preset Manager. This will let you work quickly from the saved version, but you must be sure to save this scene file separately, in case you need to change the stabilization later for some reason. And of course, going back to that saved file would mean losing later work. Approach 2 Create an image prep preset (“stab”) for the full stabilizer settings. Create another image prep preset (“quick”), and reset it. Do the Shot/Change Shot Images. Now you’ve got it both ways fast loading, and if you need to go back and change the stabilization, switch back to the first (“stab”) preset, remove the stabilization from the trackers, change the shot imagery back to the original footage, then make your stabilization changes. You’ll then need to re-write the new stabilized footage, re-apply it to the trackers, etc. Approach 1 is clearly simpler and should suffice for most simple situations. But if you need the flexibility, Approach 2 will give it to you.
https://w.atwiki.jp/btbuilder/pages/21.html
Edit Track Surface Properties コース路面の形状、地面の種類を指定する事が出来ます。 Shape 公式ページにチュートリアル動画(英語)があります Tutorials-Shapes をご覧ください http //www.bobstrackbuilder.net/videos.aspx Shapeではコース路面の形状を変えることが出来ます。 v0.8 v0.8では3D上からも編集できるようになりました。 これまでと同じようにSurfaceウィンドウから編集できるほか、3Dのコース上からドラッグして形状を変える事が出来ます。 Ctrl+クリックで新しい点を追加する事が出来ます。 Yキーを押しながらドラッグする事で、上下Y軸のみの編集が出来ます。 v0.8からの右クリックウィンドウ Select Cross Section Cross Sectionという新しい要素がv0.8から加わりました。 あらかじめ形状やマテリアルを登録し、XPacksに入れることによって、登録した形、マテリアルに変更する事が出来ます。 XPackerで登録してから使う事。 CopyとPaste v0.8から形やマテリアルをコピー&ペーストできるようになりました。 形とマテリアル、形のみ、マテリアルのみの3つがそれぞれあります。 Align 点の整列が出来ます。パーセンテージにより、整列の具合が異なります。 Material 公式ページにチュートリアル動画(英語)があります Tutorials-Materials をご覧ください http //www.bobstrackbuilder.net/videos.aspx Materialではコースの路面の種類を変えることが出来ます。 v0.8 Shapeと同じ様に、マテリアルも3D画面から編集できるようになりました。 マテリアル変更する場所の色が強調され以前より分かりやすくなりました。 v0.8からの右クリックウィンドウ Select Cross Section Shapeの同項目を参考してください。 CopyとPaste Shapeの同項目を参考にしてください。 Add material まだマテリアル指定されていない部分にマテリアルを指定する事が出来ます。 Replace Selected 選択されている部分のマテリアルを変更する事が出来ます。 Remove Material 選択されていいる部分のマテリアルを消す事が出来ます
https://w.atwiki.jp/fmatui/pages/11.html
News Number of Citations for Some Important papers (First author) Reviews(11/18): Development of 2D Photoelectron Spectroscopy Books and others(5): Papers(13/48): 共著者の方々ありがとうございます。 Proceedings(4/22): News Review #18の図が表紙を飾りました。 固体物理 48, (2013) 1月号 pp.13-21, 松井文彦, 松下智裕, 大門寛,「エネルギー損失過程と逆光電子回折現象」 Review #17の図が表紙を飾りました。 放射光(放射光学会誌)25, (2012)9月号 pp.292-300, 松井文彦, 松下智裕, 大門寛,「光電子回折の新展開:回折分光による局所電子状態プローブ」 Paper #45がEditor s choiceに選ばれました。 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 81(2012) 013601, F. Matsui, M. Hashimoto, T. Matsushita, K. Goto, N. Maejima, H. Matsui, Y. Kato, H. Daimon "Negative Photoelectron Diffraction Replica in Secondary Electron Angular Distribution". Review #7が金属学会まてりあ論文賞の対象に選ばれました!京大で授賞式があります。皆で行ってきます。 まてりあ(日本金属学会誌) 45 (2006) 791-796, 松下智裕, 郭方准, 松井文彦, 安居院あかね, 大門寛,「光電子ホログラフィーと立体原子写真法による原子配列の観測」. Proceedings #15がEditor s choiceに選ばれました。e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotech.誌、連続の快挙です! e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotech. 7 (2009) 181-185, T. Matsumoto,F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, K. Goto, Y. Kato, H. Daimon "Stereophotograph of InP(001)". Paper #35がVirtual Journal of Nanoscale Science Technology,17, (2008) Issue 22 June 2に選定されました。 Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 (2008) 207201, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, F. Z. Guo, M. Hashimoto, K. Inaji and H. Daimon, "Atomic-layer resolved magnetic and electronic structure analysis of Ni thin film on a Cu(001) surface by diffraction spectroscopy". Paper #33がEditor s choiceに選ばれました。 e-Journal. Surf. Sci. Nanotech, 5 (2007) 143-147, C. Sakai, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, T. Narikawa, and H. Daimon, “Depth resolved electronic structure of cuprate superconductor analyzed by two-dimensional x-ray Auger resonance emission spectroscopy”. Reviews#5がEditor s choiceに選ばれました。 表面科学(表面科学会誌) 26 (2005) 746-751, 松井文彦, 加藤有香子, 郭方准, 松下智裕, 大門寛,「円偏光二次元光電子分光による原子立体写真の撮影」. Number of Citations for Some Important papers (First author) Paper#5. Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 5036-5044, F. Matsui, H. W. Yeom, A. Imanishi, K. Isawa, I. Matsuda and T. Ohta, “Adsorption and reaction of acetylene and ethylene on the Si(001)2×1 surface (Times cited 64 - Web of Science)”. Paper#2. Surf. Sci. Lett. 401 (1998) L413-419, F. Matsui, H. W. Yeom, A. Imanishi, K. Isawa, I. Matsuda, T. Ohta, “Adsorption of acetylene and ethylene on the Si(001)2×1 surface studied by NEXAFS and UPS” (Times cited 58 -Web of Science). Paper#13. Appl. Phys. Lett., 81 (2002) 2556-2558, F. Matsui, Y. Hori, H. Miyata, N. Suganuma, H. Daimon, H. Totsuka, K. Ogawa, T. Furukubo, H. Namba, “Three-dimensional band mapping of graphite”(Times cited 30 -Web of Science). Paper#6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 630-633, F. Matsui, H. W. Yeom, K. Amemiya, K. Tono and T. Ohta, “Reinterpretation of O2 precursor states in initial oxidation of Si(111)7×7 surface studied by NEXAFS spectroscopy”(Times cited 29 -Web of Science). Paper#37. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 (2008) 207201, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, F. Z. Guo, M. Hashimoto, K. Inaji and H. Daimon, "Atomic-layer resolved magnetic and electronic structure analysis of Ni thin film on a Cu(001) surface by diffraction spectroscopy"(Times cited 25 -Web of Science). Paper#18. Appl. Phys. Lett., 85 (2004) 3737-3739, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, F.Z. Guo, T. Matsushita, “Visualization of graphite atomic arrangement by stereo atomscope”(Times cited 21 -Web of Science). Paper#23. Phys. Rev. B, 72 (2005) 195417-1-5, F. Matsui, H. Miyata, O.Rader, Y.Hamada, Y.Nakamura, K.Nakanishi, K,Ogawa, H. Namba, H.Daimon “Atomic-orbital analysis of the Cu Fermi surface by two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy”(Times cited 19 -Web of Science). Paper#28. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 76 (2007) 013705, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, F.Z. Guo, H. Daimon, “Site-Specific Orbital Angular Momentum Analysis of Graphite Valence Electron Using Photoelectron Forward Focusing Peaks”(Times cited 13 -Web of Science). Reviews(11/18): Development of 2D Photoelectron Spectroscopy 18. 固体物理 48, (2013) 1月号 pp.13-21, 松井文彦, 松下智裕, 大門寛,「エネルギー損失過程と逆光電子回折現象」 17. 放射光(放射光学会誌)25, (2012)9月号 pp.292-300, 松井文彦, 松下智裕, 大門寛,「光電子回折の新展開:回折分光による局所電子状態プローブ」 16. 触媒(触媒学会誌) 53, (2011) 3月号 173-177 松井文彦, 松下智裕, 大門寛,「光電子回折分光法による表面・薄膜の原子構造と原子軌道解析」 15. J.Ele.Spectrsc.Relat.Phenom. 178-179 (2010) 221-240, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, H. Daimon "Stereo Atomscope and Diffraction Spectroscopy -- Atomic Site Specific Property Analysis" 14. J.Ele.Spectrsc.Relat.Phenom. 178-179 (2010) 195-220, T. Matsushita, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, K. Hayashi "Photoelectron holography with improved image reconstruction" 13. 表面科学(表面科学会誌) 30, (2009) 1月号 28-33 松井文彦, 松下智裕, 大門寛,「回折分光法による電子・磁気構造の原子層分解解析」 12. J.Vac.Soc.Jpn., 51, (2008) 342-350, 大門寛, 松井文彦,「二次元光電子分光の分析器開発と研究展開」. 11. 未来材料(エヌ・ティー・エス), (2008) 3月号, 松下智裕, 松井文彦, 大門寛「ナノの世界を電子ホログラムで覗く」 10. まぐね(日本応用磁気学会誌), 3, (2008) 21-26, 松井文彦, 松下智裕, 郭方准, 大門寛,「二次元光電子分光・X線吸収分光法による原子層分解磁気構造解析」. 9. 画像ラボ (2007) 12月号, 松井文彦, 松下智裕, 郭方准, 大門寛,「立体写真と電子ホログラムで覗くナノの世界 結晶表面の三次元原子配置の直接観察と精密計測」. 8. まてりあ(日本金属学会誌) 46 (2007) 828-828, 松下 智裕、郭 方准、松井文彦, 大門 寛, 「光電子ホログラフィーによるイメージングについて」 7. まてりあ(日本金属学会誌) 45 (2006) 791-796, 松下智裕, 郭方准, 松井文彦, 安居院あかね, 大門寛,「光電子ホログラフィーと立体原子写真法による原子配列の観測」. 6. Prog. Surf. Sci., 81 (2006) 367-386, H. Daimon, F. Matsui, “Two-dimensional angle- resolved photo- electron spectroscopy using display analyzer ---Atomic orbital analysis and characterization of valence band”. 5. 表面科学(表面科学会誌) 26 (2005) 746-751, 松井文彦, 加藤有香子, 郭方准, 松下智裕, 大門寛,「円偏光二次元光電子分光による原子立体写真の撮影」. 4. 化学と工業(日本化学会誌)Vol.58-9(2005), 松井文彦, 大門寛,「立体原子顕微鏡が拓く3Dの世界」. 3. 応用物理(応用物理学会誌) 73 (2004) 599-604, 松井文彦, 郭方准, 大門寛,「立体原子写真」. 2. Prog. Surf. Sci., 71 (2003) 217-239 T. Nakatani, T. Matsushita, Y. Miyatake, T. Nohno, A. Kobayashi, K. Fukumoto, S. Okamoto, A. Nakamoto, F. Matsui, K. Hattori, M. Kotsugi, Y. Saitoh, S. Suga, H. Daimon, “Application of atomic stereomicroscope to surface science”. 1. 表面科学(表面科学会誌) 22 (2001) 789-795, 松井文彦, 武田さくら, 服部賢, 大門寛,「直線偏光二次元光電子分光による電子状態の研究」. Books and others(5): 00. 松井文彦ほか「二次元光電子分光メモ」 00. C.Sakai, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, NOVA "Bi2212 2D-PES" in preparation. 5. 松井文彦「放射光」2010.11「VUV-X会議参加報告」 4. 松下智裕・郭方准・松井文彦・大門寛「ナノイメージング」 (2007) ISBN 978-4-86043-153-2 エヌ・ティー・エス 3. 太田俊明・横山利彦編著「内殻分光」アイピーシー (2007) 5.4 光電子回折 分担 2. Solid-State Photoemission and Related Methods Theory and Experiment, W. Schattke, M.A. Van Hove (Eds.), Wiley-VCH Verlag Co. KgaA (2003) p274-307 Hiroshi Daimon, Fumihiko Matsui, and Kazuyuki Sakamoto Chapter 12 Angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy From traditional to two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy 1. F. Z. Guo, T. Matsushita, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, NOVA (2006) “Display-type spherical mirror analyzer for electronic and atomic structure analyses using synchrotron radiation” Papers(13/48): 共著者の方々ありがとうございます。 00. ???, in preparation, N. Takahashi, F. Matsui, et al. "Graphite Edge State Identification by Real Space Scanning Two Dimentional Spectroscopy". 00. ???, in preparation, A. Tanaka, F. Matsui, et al. "Umklapp ...". 00. ???, in preparation, M. Ono, F. Matsui, M. Yoshimura, H. Daimon, "Reactivity of Au atoms on Si surface probed by Benzenethiol". 00. ???, in preparation, T. Narikawa, F. Matsui, et al. "Direct Stereoscopic Observation of Adatoms and Dimer atoms of Si surfaces". 49. JPSJ, accepted, T. Matsushita, F. Matsui, K. Goto, T. Matsumoto, H. Daimon, "Element identification for three-dimensional atomic imaging by photoelectron holography". 48. JJAP, (2013) accepted, F. Matsui, R. Ishii, et al. Exfoliated graphene 47. Nanoletters, (2013) accepted, S. Roth, F. Matsui, T. Greber, J. Osterwalder, "Chemical Vapor Deposition and Characterization of Aligned and Incommensurate Graphene/Hexagonal Boron Nitride Heterostack on Cu(111)", dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl400815w. 46. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 81(2012) p.114604, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, H. Daimon, "Photoelectron diffraction and holographic reconstruction of graphite". 45. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 81(2012) 013601, F. Matsui, M. Hashimoto, T. Matsushita, K. Goto, N. Maejima, H. Matsui, Y. Kato, H. Daimon "Negative Photoelectron Diffraction Replica in Secondary Electron Angular Distribution". 44. Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Research Sec. A 661 (2012) 98-105, L. Toth, H. Matsuda, F. Matsui, K. Goto, H. Daimon, "Details of 1pi sr wide acceptance angle electrostatic lens for electron energy and two-dimensional angular distribution analysis combined with real space imaging" 43. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotech. 9 (2011) 311-314, K. Goto, H. Matsuda, M. Hashimoto, H. Nojiri, C. Sakai, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, L. Tóth, T. Matsushita "Development of Display-Type Ellipsoidal Mesh Analyzer". 42. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 80 (2011) 013601, F. Matsui, N. Nishikayama, N. Maejima, H. Matsui, K. Goto, M. Hashimoto, T. Hatayama, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, H. Daimon "Site-Specific Stereograph of SiC(0001) Surface by Inverse Matrix Method". 41. e-J.SSNT, 8 (2010) 303-308, M. Yoshimura, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, "Regular array of L-tylosine molecules on Si(111)-Au superstructures". 40. Phys. Rev. B, 79 (2009) 245104, O. Rader, H. Wolf, and W. Gudat, A. Tadich, L. Broekman, E. Huwald, R. C. G. Leckey, and J. D. Riley, A. M. Shikin, F. Matsui, H. Miyata, and H. Daimon, "Apparent “three-dimensional” Fermi surface of transition-metal monolayers". 39. Phys. Rev. B, 78 (2008) 144111, T. Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, M. Suzuki, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, and K. Hayashi, "Reconstruction Algorithm from an Atomic-Resolution Holography using Translational Symmetry". 38. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 77(2008) 103301, K. Goto, F. Matsui, Matsushita, Y. Kato, and H. Daimon, "Orbital Angular Momentum of Iron Valence Band Electron Analyzed by Photoelectron Stereography". 37. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 (2008) 207201, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, F. Z. Guo, M. Hashimoto, K. Inaji and H. Daimon, "Atomic-layer resolved magnetic and electronic structure analysis of Ni thin film on a Cu(001) surface by diffraction spectroscopy". 36. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 163/1-3(2008) pp 45-50, N. Takahashi, F. Matsui, Hiroyuki Matsuda, Yoji Hamada, Koji Nakanishi, Hidetoshi Namba and Hiroshi Daimon, "Improvement of Display-Type Spherical Mirror Analyzer for Real Space Mapping of Electronic and Atomic Structures". 35. e-Journal. Surf. Sci. Nanotech, 5 (2007) 143-147, C. Sakai, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, T. Narikawa, and H. Daimon, “Depth resolved electronic structure of cuprate superconductor analyzed by two-dimensional x-ray Auger resonance emission spectroscopy”. 34. Appl. Phys. Lett., 91 251914 (2007), Y. Kato, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, H. Daimon, “Dopant-site effect in superconducting diamond (111) studied by atomic stereophotography”. 33. J. Electron Spectrosc. Rel. Phenom., 156-158 (2007) 1-9, H. Daimon, F. Matsui, F. Z. Fuo, T. Matsushita “Circularly polarized X-ray photoelectron diffraction - Stereo photograph of atomic arrangement”. 32. Physica C, 467 (2007) 43-50, C. Sakai, F. Matsui, N. Takahashi, S. N. Takeda, H. Daimon, “Fermi energy band dispersion and orbital symmetry of Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy studied by non-polarized-light two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy”. 31. Phys. Rev. E, 75 (2007) 046402, H. Matsuda, H. Daimon, L. Toth, F. Matsui, “Approach for simultaneous measurement of two-dimensional angular distribution of charged particles.Ⅲ. Fine focusing of wide-angle beams in multiple lens systems”. 30. Surf. Rev. Lett., 14 (2007) 637 - 643, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, F.Z. Guo, H. Daimon, “Stereo photograph of atomic arrangement and atomic orbital analysis by two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy”. 29. Phys. Rev. B, 75 (2007) 085419, T. Matsushita, F.Z. Guo, F. Matsui, Y. Kato, H. Daimon, “Three-dimensional atomic arrangement reconstruction from Auger electron hologram”. 28. J. Phys. Soc. Japan (JPSJ), 76 (2007) 013705, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, F.Z. Guo, H. Daimon, “Site-Specific Orbital Angular Momentum Analysis of Graphite Valence Electron Using Photoelectron Forward Focusing Peaks”. 27. Sci. Tech. Adv. Materials (STAM), 7 (2006) S45-S48, Y. Kato, F. Matsui, T. Shimizu, T. Matsushita, F.Z. Guo, T. Tsuno, H. Daimon, “Stereophotographs of diamond and graphite”. 26. Surf. Interface Anal., 38 (2006) 1604-1606, F.Z. Guo, T. Matsushita, F. Matsui, Y. Kato, H. Daimon, “Photoelectron angular distribution of 2H-NbSe2 Studied by Display-Type Spherical Mirror Analyzer and Circularly Polarized Light”. 25. J. Appl. Phys., 99 (2006) 024907, F. Z. Guo, T. Matsushita, K. Kobayashi, F. Matsui, Y. Kato, H. Daimon, M. Koyano, Y. Yamamura, T. Tsuji, Y. Saitoh, “Atomic stereophotograph of intercalation compound Fe1/3NbS2”. 24. Ferroelectrics, 332, (2006) 13-19, J. Nayeem, T. Kikuta, N. Nakatani , F. Matsui, S. Nishino Takeda, K. Hattori, H. Daimon, “Ferroelectric Phase Transition Character of Glycine Phosphite”. 23. Phys. Rev. B, 72 (2005) 195417-1-5, F. Matsui, H. Miyata, O.Rader, Y.Hamada, Y.Nakamura, K.Nakanishi, K,Ogawa, H. Namba, H.Daimon “Atomic-orbital analysis of the Cu Fermi surface by two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy”. 22. J. Vac. Soc. Japan, 48 (2005) 304-308, J. Nayeem, S. Nishino Takeda, F. Matsui, K. Hattori, H. Daimon, “Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Observation of Germapericycline on a Graphite Surface”. 21. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenomena, 144-147 (2005) 1067-1070, F.Z. Guo, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, H. Daimon, “Atomic Stereo-photographs of Cu Single Crystal”. 20. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 108 (2004) 12946-12954, H. Kondoh, A. Nambu, Y. Ehara, F. Matsui, T. Yokoyama, T. Ohta, “Substrate dependence of self-assembly of alkanethiol X-ray absorption fine structure study”(Times cited 9 -2009). 19. Appl. Surf. Sci., 237 (2004) 311-315, A.N. Hattori, M. Fujikado, T. Uchida, S. Okamoto, K. Fukumoto, F.Z. Guo, F. Matsui, K. Nakatani, T. Matsushita, K. Hattori, H. Daimon, “Atomic structure of Fe thin-films on Cu(001) studied with Stereoscopic photography”. 18. Appl. Phys. Lett., 85 (2004) 3737-3739, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, F.Z. Guo, T. Matsushita, “Visualization of graphite atomic arrangement by stereo atomscope”(Times cited 19 - 2008). 17. Appl. Surf. Sci., 237 (2004) 616-620, F. Z. Guo, F. Matsui, M. Fujikado, T. Matsushita, H. Daimon, “Stereoscopic Photographs of Atomic Arrangements in Single Crystal MoS2”. 16. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 42 (2003) 4756-4759, T. Nohno, F. Matsui, Y. Hamada, H. Matsumoto, S. Takeda, K. Hattori, H. Daimon, “Development of High-Energy- Resolution Display-Type Photoelectron Spectrometer in the UPS Region”. 15. Surf. Sci., 525 (2003) 57-65, K. Hattori, K. Ishihara, Y. Miyatake, F. Matsui, S. Takeda, H. Daimon, F. Komori, “GaP(111) reconstructed surface studied with STM and LEED”. 14. MOLECULAR CRYSTALS AND LIQUID CRYSTALS, 377 (2002) 45-48, H. Kondoh, T. Nakamura, F. Matsui, T. Yokoyama, T. Ohta, M. Matsumoto, “Structure of 2-mercaptomethylthiophene monolayers on Au(111)”. 13. Appl. Phys. Lett., 81 (2002) 2556-2558, F. Matsui, Y. Hori, H. Miyata, N. Suganuma, H. Daimon, H. Totsuka, K. Ogawa, T. Furukubo, H. Namba, “Three-dimensional band mapping of graphite”(Times cited 26 -2009). 12. Phys. Rev. B, 65 (2002) 201309-1-4(R), K. Sakamoto, F. Matsui, M. Hirano, H. W. Yeom, H. M. Zhang, R. I. G. Uhrberg, “Determination of the bonding configuration of the metastable molecular oxygen adsorbed on a Si(111)-(7×7) surface”(cited by 6 articles -2005). 11. Surf. Sci., 493 (2001) 604-609, K. Sakamoto, D. Kondo, H. Takeda, T. Sato, S. Suga, F. Matsui, K. Amemiya, T. Ohta, W. Uchida, A. Kasuya, “Thermal-dependent unoccupied electronic structure of a C60 monolyaer film adorbed on a Si(111)-(7x7) surface”(Times cited 7 - Web of Science 2009). 10. J. Synchrotron Radiation, 8 (2001) 505-507, D. Kondo, K. Sakamoto, H. Takeda, F. Matsui, T. Ohta, K. Amemiya, W. Uchida, A. Kasuya, “Thermal effect in unoccupied molecular orbitals of C60 molecules adsorbed on a Si(001)-(2x1) surface studied by NEXAFS”. 9. J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001) 12870-12878, H. Kondoh, N. Saito, F. Matsui, T. Yokoyama, T. Ohta, H. Kuroda, “Structure of Alkanethiolate Monolayers on Cu(100) Self-Assembly on the Four-Fold Symmetry Surface”(Times cited 24 - Web of Science 2009). 8. Langmuir 17 (2001) 8178 - 8183, H. Kondoh, F. Matsui, Y. Ehara, T. Yokoyama, T. Ohta, “Surface-Monolayer-Controlled Molecular Alignment of Short n-Alkane Multilayers”(Times cited 12 - Web of Science 2009). 7. Langmuir 16 (2000) 4213 - 4216, T. Nakamura, R. Kimura, F. Matsui, H. Kondo, T. Ohta, H. Sakai, M. Abe, M. Matsumoto, “Self-Assembled Monolayers of Heavy Chalcogenophenes and Dialkyl Heavy Chalcogenides on Au(111)”(cited by 14 articles -2009). 6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 630-633, F. Matsui, H. W. Yeom, K. Amemiya, K. Tono and T. Ohta, “Reinterpretation of O2 precursor states in initial oxidation of Si(111)7×7 surface studied by NEXAFS spectroscopy”(Times cited 24 articles -2009). 5. Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 5036-5044, F. Matsui, H. W. Yeom, A. Imanishi, K. Isawa, I. Matsuda and T. Ohta, “Adsorption and reaction of acetylene and ethylene on the Si(001)2×1 surface (Times cited 52 - Web of Science 2009)”. 4. J. Synchrotron Radiation, 6 (1999) 787-789, T. Tsuduki, A. Imanishi, K. Isawa, S. Terada, F. Matsui, M. Kiguchi, T. Yokoyama, T. Ohta, “Adsorption Structures of alkanethiols self-assembled monolayers on the Cu(100) surface studied by S-K EXAFS and C-K NEXAFS spectroscopies”(cited by 8 articles -2009). 3. Surf. Sci. 407 (1998) 282 - 292, A. Imanishi, K. Isawa, F. Matsui, T. Tsuduki, Y. Yokoyama, H. Kondoh, Y. Kitajima, T. Ohta, “Structural studies of adsorbed alkanethiols on Cu(100) by use of S and C K-edge X-ray absorption fine structures”(cited by 44 articles -2009). 2. Surf. Sci. Lett. 401 (1998) L413-419, F. Matsui, H. W. Yeom, A. Imanishi, K. Isawa, I. Matsuda, T. Ohta, “Adsorption of acetylene and ethylene on the Si(001)2×1 surface studied by NEXAFS and UPS” (cited by 51 articles -Web of Science 2009). 1. Surf. Sci. 373 (1997) 1-10, T. Nakahashi, S. Terada, T. Yokoyama, H. Hamamatsu, Y. Kitajima, M. Sakano, F. Matsui, T. Ohta, “Adsorption of SO2 on Cu(100) studied by X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy (cited 33 times-Web of Science 2009)”. Proceedings(4/22): 22. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotech. 9 (2011) 153-157, T. Matsushita, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, K. Hayashi, "Reconstruction Algorithm for Atomic Resolution Holography". 21. Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Research Sec. A 648 (2011) S139-S141, H. Daimon, F. Matsui, T. Matsumoto, K. Goto, Y. Kato, T. Matsushita, “Direct imaging of three-dimensional atomic arrangement by stereophotography using two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy”. 20. Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Research Sec. A 648 (2011) S58-S59, L. Toth, K. Goto, H. Matsuda, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, "New 1π sr acceptance angle display-type ellipsoidal mesh analyzer for electron energy and two-dimensional angular distribution as well as imaging analysis" 19. J. Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 181 (2010) 193-196, M. Takizawa, H. Namba, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, “Photon energy dependence of graphite valence band photoelectron intensity”. 18. J. Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 181 (2010) 150-153, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, H. Daimon, “Atomic-layer-resolved analysis of surface magnetism by diffraction spectroscopy”. 17. J. Phys. Conference Series 190 (2009) 012111, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, M. Hashimoto, Hiroshi Daimon, "Disentangling atomic-layer-specific x-ray absorption spectra by Auger electron diffraction spectroscopy". 16. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotech. 7 (2009) 181-185, T. Matsumoto,F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, K. Goto, Y. Kato, H. Daimon "Stereophotograph of InP(001)". 15. J. Vac. Soc. Jpn. 51 (2008), 135, L. Toth, H. Matsuda, T. Shimizu, F. Matsui, and H. Daimon, “New Simple Photoemission Electron Microscope with an Energy Filter”. 14. Appl. Surface Science 254 (2008), 7679-7683, Zs.Janosfalvi, F. Matsui, N. Takahashi, M. Akasaka, H. Namba, and H. Daimon, “Atomic orbitals and photoelectron intensity angular distributions of MoS2 valence band”. 13. Applied Surface Science, 254 (2008) 7549-7552, K. Inaji, F. Matsui, Y. Kato, C. Sakai, T. Narikawa, T. Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, and H. Daimon, “Circular dichroism of forward focusing peaks in 2pi steradian photoelectron pattern”. 12. Surf. Sci., 601 (2007) 4748-4753, H. Daimon, H. Matsuda, Laszlo Toth, F. Matsui, “Stereo-PEEM for three-dimensional atomic and electronic structures of microscopic materials”. 11. Surf. Sci., 601 (2007) 5284-5288, H. Yamatani, K. Hattori, T. Matsuta, T. Ito, T. Nohno, M. Hori, Y. Miyatake, S. Konno, T. Tanaka, Yoji Hamada, H. Katagiri, M. Hibi, T. Miyai, M. Hashimoto, K. Kataoka, T. Tatsuta, A. N. Hattori, N. Higashi, M. Honda, N. Masunaga, H. Mino, S. Yasui, J. Nayeem, T. Shimizu, N. Takahashi, Y. Kato, C. Sakai, M. Yoshimura, S. N. Takeda, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Total analysis of surface structure and properties by UHV transfer system”. 10. AIP Conf. Proc., 879 (2006) 547, Y. Hamada, F. Matsui, Y. Nozawa, K. Nakanishi, M. Nampei, K. Ogawa, S. Shigenai, N. Takahashi, H. Daimon, H. Namba, “Construction of Two-dimensional Photoelectron Spectroscopy Beamline at Rits SR Center for Investigation of Surface Electronic Structure”. 9. AIP Conf. Proc., 879 (2006) 1180, N. Takahashi, F. Matsui, H. Matsuda, S. Shigenai, Y. Hirama, Y. Hamada, K. Nakanishi, H. Namba, H. Daimon, “New Display-type analyzer for Fermi surface mapping and atomic orbital analysis at Ritsumeikan SR Center”. 8. AIP Conf. Proc., 879 (2006) 1164, T. Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, T. Muro, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, “A Real-Time Imaging System for Stereo Atomic Microscopy at SPring-8 s BL25SU”. 7. Surf. Rev. Lett., 13 (2006) 209-214, K. Kataoka, F. Matsui, Y. Kato, F.Z. Guo, T. Matsushita, K. Hattori, H. Daimon, “Atomic Structure Analysis of Ultra Thin Fe Silicide Films by Stereo Atomscope”. 6. Surf. Rev. Lett., 13 (2006) 197-200, M.Honda, F. Matsui, H.Daimon, “Chemisorption of L-cysteine on Au(111)/Si(111) and Si(111) sqrt3-sqrt3 - Au Surfaces”. 5. Czech. J. Phys., 56 (2006) 267-276, O. Romanyuk, K. Kataoka, F. Matsui, K. Hattori, H. Daimon, “Structure analysis of thin iron silicide film from phi-scan RHEED Patterson function”. 4. Czech. J. Phys., 56 (2006) 61-68, F. Matsui, M.Fujikado, H.Daimon, B. C. Sell, C. S. Fadley, A. Kobayashi, “Structural analysis of oxygen segregated Nb(110) surface by photoelectron diffraction”. 3. Surf. Sci., 514 (2002) 337-342, Daiyu Kondo, Kazuyuki Sakamoto, Hideo Takeda, Fumihiko Matsui, Kenta Amemiya, Toshiaki Ohta, Wakio Uchida and Atsuo Kasuya, “Unoccupied molecular orbitals of C60 molecules adsorbed on Si(0 0 1)-(2×1) and Si(1 1 1)-(7×7) surfaces studied by NEXAFS”(Times cited 12 -2009). 2. Proc. 3rd Int. Sympo. Atomic Level Characterizations for New Materials and Devices 01, (2001) F. Matsui, H. Miyata, H. Namba, H. Daimon, “Three-dimensional band mapping and orbital analysis by linearly-polarized light two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy”. 1. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE IV 7 (1997) 679-681, T. Nakahashi, H. Hamamatsu, S. Terada, M. Sakano, F. Matsui, T. Yokoyama, Y. Kitajima, T. Ohta, "Adsorption and surface reaction of SO2 on Cu(100) studied by S K-edge XAFS and STM" 以下は本サイト@wikiのスポンサーの広告です。
https://w.atwiki.jp/todo314/pages/461.html
Risk-Sensitive Submodular Optimization Bryan Wilder AAAI 2018 概要 確率的連続劣モジュラ関数のCVaR最大化 非凹なので大変だが1-1/e近似可能 集合上のポートフォリオを構築できます アルゴリズム 問題 $$ \max_{\vec{x}, \tau} \tau - \frac{1}{\alpha}\mathbb{E}_y[ [\tau-F(\vec{x},y)]^+ ] $$ 難しさ F(*,y)がxについて凹なら、CVaRは凹最適化 劣モジュラ(2階微分が非正)の場合、そんなことはない だけど、非負方向に凹(up-concave性) Frank-Wolfは使えるの? 今の勾配から線形最適化を解いて一番遠いところを目指す $$ \vec{x}^k = \vec{x}^{k-1} + \gamma_k (\vec{v}^k - \vec{x}^{k-1}) $$ up-concaveな関数にこの方法は使えない→毎回xが単調増加するように変更→1-1/e近似 アプローチ 経験的CVaRを最大化したい 現xの勾配から線形計画信託 xを更新($$ \vec{x}^k \leftarrow \vec{x}^{k-1}+\frac{1}{K}\vec{v} $$) τを更新(これは単一パラメタの最適化で可能) 勾配の計算:微分不可で難しい、積分で近似 最適なτ:頑張るとできる 理論的解析:ゲキムズ 集合上のポートフォリオへ… 多重線形拡張を使ってFで解いて丸める [O.-Yoshida. WWW 07]との違い 劣モジュラ一般に使える 近似がいい感じ(相対誤差なので…) 近似が負にならない 実験 汚染検知みたいな問題 まとめ これは中々すごい 連続劣モジュラ関数なら、そのまま最適化できる AAAI リスク回避最適化 劣モジュラ 2018/09/18
https://w.atwiki.jp/asigami/pages/3908.html
曲名 アーティスト フォルダ 難易度 BPM NOTES/FREEZE(SHOCK) Surface Stessie A3 激12 150 313/40 STREAM VOLTAGE AIR FREEZE CHAOS 57 62 27 68 31 踊譜面(9) / 激譜面(12) 譜面 動画 https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY9CjEElzHw (2P x3.5, NOTE) https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=VblA9MohgB8 (1P x3.75, NOTE| 2P x4, NOTE, REVERSE) 解説 DDR A3稼働時追加楽曲(2022/03/17~)。 コメント コメント(感想など) 最新の10件を表示しています。コメント過去ログ?
https://w.atwiki.jp/fmatui/pages/195.html
International Conferences H. Matsuda, L. Tóth, K. Goto, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, M. Hashimoto, C. Sakai, H. Nojiri, H. Daimon “Wide acceptance angle photoelectron spectrometer for stereophotograph of atomic arrangement” 3’S 11 (Lleida, Spain 2011.03.11) F. Matsui, H. Matsui, T. Matsushita, K. Goto, N. Maejima, N. Nishikayama, K. Tanaka, H. Daimon “Local atomic and electronic structure of graphene studied by photoelectron diffraction spectroscopy” SSNS’11 (Shizukuishi, Japan 2011.01.19) 【BEST POSTER賞受賞】 K. Goto, F. Matsui, T. Matsumoto, M. Hashimoto, N. Nishikayama, H. Matsui, N. Maejima, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, H. Daimon, “Orbital angular momentum analysis of 1T-TaS2 valence band electron by circularly polarized light photoelectron diffraction” NSS6 (Kobe, Japan 2010.10.26) H. Matsui, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, M. Hashimoto, K. Goto, N. Maejima, H. Daimon “Photoelectron diffraction and holography of graphite and graphene”NSS6 (Kobe, Japan 2010.10.26) N. Maejima, F. Matsui, K. Goto, N. Nishikayama, H. Matsui, M. Hashimoto, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, S. Tanaka, H. Daimon “Atomic structure analysis of silicon oxynitride thin film on 6H-SiC(0001) by two-dimensional photoelectron diffraction” NSS6 (Kobe, Japan 2010.10.26) T. Matsushita, I. Pis, M. Kobata, K. Kobayashi, H. Matsuda, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, A. Uesaka, K. Hayashi “High-energy photoelectron holography” NSS6 (Kobe, Japan 2010.10.26) T. Matsushita, K. Goto, H. Matsuda, M. Hashimoto, L. Tóth, H. Nojiri, C. Sakai, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Development of an electron microscope using wide acceptance angle electron lens” NSS6 (Kobe, Japan 2010.10.26) H. Daimon, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita “Surface Structure Analysis by Stereo-photograph of atomic arrangement” RJSSS-9 (Vladivostok, Russia 2010.09.26-30) F. Matsui, M. Hashimoto, T. Matsushita, N. Maejima, H. Matsui, K. Goto, Y. Kato, H. Daimon “Negative contrast photoelectron diffraction replica in secondary electron angular distribution” VUVX2010 (Vancouver, Canada 2010.07.12) N. Maejima, F. Matsui, K. Goto, N. Nishikayama, H. Matsui, M. Hashimoto, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, S. Tanaka, H. Daimon “Atomic structure analysis of silicon oxynitride thin film on 6H-SiC(0001) by two-dimensional photoelectron diffraction” VUVX2010 (Vancouver, Canada 2010.07.12) H. Matsui, F. Matsui, N. Nishikayama, M. Hashimoto, K. Goto, N. Maejima, K. Tanaka, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, T. Okamoto, A. N. Hattori, Y. Sano, K. Yamauchi, H. Daimon “Structure analysis of graphene grown on 4H-SiC(0001) surface by two-dimensional photoelectron diffraction” VUVX2010 (Vancouver, Canada 2010.07.12) M. Hashimoto, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, F.Z. Guo, Y. Kato, H. Daimon “Circular Dichroism of Photoelectron Diffraction Rings from Ga/Si(111)” ALC 09 (Hawaii, USA 2009.12.10) L. Tóth, H. Matsuda, K. Goto, H. Nojiri, M. Hashimoto, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Display-type Ellipsoidal Mesh Analyzer for Microscopic and High-resolution Two-dimensional Photoelectron Spectroscopy” ALC 09 (Hawaii, USA 2009.12.10) 【Invited】F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, H. Daimon “Atomic-layer-resolved analysis of surface magnetism by diffraction spectroscopy” ICESS-11 (Nara, Japan 2009.10.06) M. Hashimoto, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, H. Daimon “Photoelectron diffraction rings of Ga adsorbed Si(111) surface and their circular dichroism” ICESS-11 (Nara, Japan 2009.10.06) M. Takizawa, H. Namba, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Photoelectron intensity modulation of the Fermi surface on graphite with photon energy” ICESS-11 (Nara, Japan 2009.10.07) H. Nojiri, H. Matsuda, L. Tóth, K. Goto, M. Hashimoto, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “New 1pi steradian display-type ellipsoidal mesh analyzer as a low-magnification PEEM” ICESS-11 (Nara, Japan 2009.10.07) K. Goto, F. Matsui, T. Matsumoto, N. Nishikayama, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, C.S. Fadley, H. Daimon “Circular dichroism of photoelectron diffraction of transition metal dichalcogenides” ICESS-11 (Nara, Japan 2009.10.08) N. Nishikayama, F. Matsui, K. Goto, T. Matsumoto, K. Tanaka, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, H. Daimon “Stereophotograph of graphene on vicinal 4H-SiC(0001) surface”ICESS-11 (Nara, Japan 2009.10.08) M. Yoshimura, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Structure of L-tyrosine adsorbed on atomically controlled Au/Si(111) surfaces” ACSIN10 (Granada, Spain 2009.09.24) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, M. Hashimoto, H.Daimon “Resolving subsurface magnetism at atomic by diffraction spectroscopy” XAFS 14 (Camerino, Italy 2009.07.26-31) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, K. Goto, H. Daimon “Recent status of 2D photoelectron spectroscopy experimental station at SPring-8” XAFS 14 (Camerino, Italy 2009.07.26-31) H. Daimon, K. Goto, H. Matsuda, F. Matsui “Application of Wide Acceptance Angle Electrostatic Lens to high-energy two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy” EMRS 2009 Spring Meeting (Strasbourg, France 2009.06.09) K. Goto, F. Matsui, T. Matsumoto, N. Nishikayama, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, H. Daimon “Magnetic structure analysis of Gd film by Auger electron diffraction and XMCD” EMRS 2009 Spring Meeting (Strasbourg, France 2009.06.09) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, C. Sakai, T. Narikawa, K. Goro, T. Matsumoto, H. Daimon “Diffraction Spectroscopy for Probing Subsurface Resolution and Selectivity” ISSS-5 (Tokyo, Japan 2008.11.09-13) K. Goto, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, H. Daimon “Circularly polarized light 2D- PED/XAS of Fe (111) surface” ISSS-5 (Tokyo, Japan 2008.11.09-13) T. Matsumoto, F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, K. Goto, H. Daimon “Stereophotograph of InP(001) surface” ISSS-5 (Tokyo, Japan 2008.11.09-13) M. Yoshimura, M. Ono, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Adsorption structure of L-tyrosine on Si(111)5×2,√3 × √3-Au surface” ISSS-5 (Tokyo, Japan 2008.11.09-13) H. Daimon, L. Tóth, K. Goto, H. Matsuda, F. Matsui “Two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy by conventional and newly-developed display analyzer” ISSS-5 (Tokyo, Japan 2008.11.09-13) H. Daimon, H. Matsuda, L. Tóth, K. Goto, F. Matsui “Performance of Stereo-PEEM for Taking Stereo picture of Atomic Arrangement in Laboratory” VASSCAA-4 (Matsue, Japan 2008.10.28-31) H. Daimon, L. Tóth, K. Goto, H. Matsuda, F. Matsui “Development of Stereo-PEEM and a new display analyzer for Stereo-pictures of atomic arrangement” LEEM/PEEM-6 (Trieste, Italy 2008.07.07-11) K. Goto, L. Tóth, H. Matsuda, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Construction of Display-type Ellipsoidal Mesh Analyzer for Imaging as well as Electron Energy and Angular Distribution Analysis” LEEM/PEEM-6 (Trieste, Italy 2008.07.07-11) T. Matsushita, F.Z. Guo, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Three-dimensional atomic image reconstructing from a single-energy electron hologram” NSSS-4 (Athens, Ohio, USA 2008.07.15-19) M. Yoshimura, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Adsorption structure of L-Tyrosine on Si(111)7x7 surface” ACSIN-9 (Tokyo, Japan 2007.11-15) T. Narikawa, F. Matsui, Y. Kato, K. Inaji, C. Sakai, T. Matsushita, H. Daimon “Direct observations of Si adatom and dimer atom from O atoms inserted in backbonds by Auger electron diffraction” ACSIN-9 (Tokyo, Japan 2007.11-15) Z. Janosfalvi, F. Matsui, N. Takahashi, M. Akasaka, H. Namba. H. Daimon “Atomic orbitals and photoelectron intensity angular distribution patterns of MoS2 valence band” ACSIN-9 (Tokyo, Japan 2007.11-15) K. Inaji, F. Matsui, Y. Kato, C. Sakai, T. Narikawa, T. Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, H. Daimon “Circular dichroism of forward focusing peaks and diffraction rings in Si 2p photoelectron intensity angular distribution” ACSIN-9 (Tokyo, Japan 2007.11-15) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, M. Hashimoto, K Inaji, C. Sakai, T. Narikawa, F. Z. Guo, H. Daimon “Auger diffraction XANES and XMCD for atomic-layer-resolved magnetic structure analysis of Ni magnetic thin film” VUV-XV (Berlin, Germany 2007.07.29-08.03) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, K. Inaji, C. Sakai, T. Narikawa, F. Z. Guo, H. Daimon “Origin of forward focusing peaks in graphite valence band photoelectron pattern and their circular dichrosim” VUV-XV (Berlin, Germany 2007.07.29-08.03) N. Takahashi, Y. Hamada, F. Matsui, K. Nakanishi, H. Namba, H. Daimon “Display-type Analyzer(DIANA) for valence band spectroscopy and microscopy” VUV-XV (Berlin, Germany 2007.07.29-08.03) O. Rader, H Wolf, W. Gudat, A. Tadich, L. Broekman, E. Huwald, R. C. G. Leckey, J. D. Rieley, F. Matsui, H. Miyata, H. Daimon, A. M. Shikin “On the problem of the "three-dimentional" Fermi surface of the Ni monolayer on Cu(100)” VUV-XV (Berlin, Germany 2007.07.29-08.03) C. Sakai, F. Matsui, T. Takeuchi, T. Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, Y. Kato, K. Inaji, T. Narikawa, H. Daimon “Local Structure analysis of Bi2201 and Bi2212 by photoelectron stereophotograph using circularly polarized light” VUV-XV (Berlin, Germany 2007.07.29-08.03) C. Sakai, F. Matsui, N. Takahashi, S. N. Takeda, H. Daimon “Hybridized orbital symmetry determination of the Fermi Energy band of Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy superconductor by non-polarized light two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy” Kyoto conference on Solid State Chemistry (Kyoto, Japan 2006.11.14-18) C. Sakai, F. Matsui, N. Takahashi, S.N. Takeda, H. Daimon “The Hybridized orbital symmetry of the Fermi Energy band of Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy determined by non-polarized light two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy” ISS 2006 (Nagoya, Japan 2006.10.30-11.01) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, K. Inaji, F. Z. Guo, H. Daimon “Lateral electronic structure analysis in atomic scale by 2D-XAFS/XMCD” LEEM/PEEM-V (Himeji, Japan 2006.10.15-19) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, K. Inaji, F.Z. Guo, H. Daimon “Site-specific orbital angular momentum analysis of graphite valence band” ISSP10 (Kashiwa, Japan 2006.10.09-13) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, Y. Kato, K. Inaji, F.Z. Guo, H. Daimon “Atomic layer resolved two-dimensional XAFS Ni wedged film on Cu(001)” ISSP10 (Kashiwa, Japan 2006.10.09-13) H. Daimon, T. Matsuta, S. N. Takeda, K. Hattori, F. Matsui “Total analysis of surface structure and properties by UHV transfer system” ISSP10 (Kashiwa, Japan 2006.10.09-13) C. Sakai, F. Matsui, N. Takahashi, S. N. Takeda, H. Daimon “Atomic orbital analysis of the Fermi surface of Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy by Two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy” ISSP10 (Kashiwa, Japan 2006.10.09-13) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, Y. Kato, M. Hashimoto, K. Inaji, H. Daimon “Element and site selective XAFS and XMCD for surface and thin film” ECOSS 24 (Paris, France 2006.09.04-08) L. Tóth, H. Matsuda, T. Shimizu, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Wide acceptance angle electrostatic lens for high sensitive and two-dimensional analyzer” ECOSS 24 (Paris, France 2006.09.04-08) F. Matsui, Y. Kato, H. Daimon, T. Matsushita, F.Z. Guo “Photoelectron forward focusing peak as an element and cite specific local probe” SRI 2006 (Daegu, Korea 2006.05.28-06.03) Y. Kato, F. Matsui, H. Daimon, T .Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, T. Tsuno “Determination of Local Dopant site in Superconducting-diamond by Photoelecron Intensity Angular Distribution” SRI 2006 (Daegu, Korea 2006.05.28-06.03) T. Matsushita, F. Z. Guo, T. Muro, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Real time imaging system of stereo atomic microscope at BL25SU in SPring-8” SRI 2006 (Daegu, Korea 2006.05.28-06.03) 【BEST POSTER賞受賞】N. Takahashi, F. Matsui, S. Shigenai, Y. Hirama, Y. Hamada, K. Nakanishi, H. Namba, H. Daimon “New Display-type analyzer for 3D Fermi surface mapping and atomic orbital analysis” SRI 2006 (Daegu, Korea 2006.05.28-06.03) 【Invited】F. Matsui, Y. Kato, T. Shimizu, F. Z. Guo, T. Matsushita, T. Tsuno, H. Daimon “Graphite and Diamond viewed by Stereo Atomscope” IWSDRM2005 (Tsukuba, Japan 2005.12.07-09) Y. Kato, T. Shimizu, F. Matsui, F. Z. Guo, T. Matsusita, T. Tsuno, S. Katsumoto, H. Daimon “Local boron site of B-Diamond determined by photoelectron intensity angular distribution” IWSDRM2005 (Tsukuba, Japan 2005.12.07-09) F. Matsui, T. Matsushita, F.Z. Guo, Y. Kato, T. Shimizu, H. Daimon “Optimization of Display-type Analyzer for High-Performance Stereoatomscope” ISSS-4 (Omiya, Japan 2005.11.14-17) F. Matsui, T. Wada, K. Sakamoto, S. Takada, T. Suzuki, A. Harasawa, T. Okuda, T. Kinoshita, H. Daimon, “Si 2p 2 core-level photoemission study of initial stage of Si(001) surface oxidation” ISSS-4 (Omiya, Japan 2005.11.14-17) N. Takahashi, F. Matsui, S. Shigenai, K. Nakanishi, Y. Hamada, H. Namba, H. Daimon “Atomic orbital analysis of Fermi surface of NbSe2 by Display-type Analyzer (DIANA)” ISSS-4 (Omiya, Japan 2005.11.14-17) F. Matsui, N. Takahashi, M. Akasaka, K. Nakanishi, Y. Nozawa, H. Namba, Y. Hamada, H. Daimon “Atomic orbital analysis of three-dimensional band dispersion of MoS2 by two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy” SSP10 (Prague, Czech 2005.07.10-15) F. Matsui, A. Kobayashi, M. Fujikado, H. Daimon, B.C. Sell, C.S. Fadley “Structural analysis of oxygen segragated Nb(110) surface by photoelectron diffraction” SSP10 (Prague, Czech 2005.07.10-15) H. Daimon, H. Matsuda, L. Tóth, T. Shimizu, F. Matsui “New Photoemission Electron Microscope for Three-dimensional Atomic and Electronic Structure of Nano-materials” EPS13 (Bern, Switzerland 2005.07.11-15) 【BEST POSTER賞受賞】K. Kataoka , F. Matsui, Y. Kato , F. Z. Guo , T. Matsushita ,K. Hattori , H. Daimon “Atomic structure analysis of ultrathin Fe silicide films by stereo atomscope” ICMAT2005, 9th IUMRS-ICAM, VASSCAA-3 (Singapore 2005.07.03-08) M. Honda, F. Matsui, H. Daimon “Chemisorption of Amino Acid on Au(111)/Si(111) and Si(111)√3×√3 - Au Surfaces” ICMAT2005, 9th IUMRS-ICAM, VASSCAA (Singapore 2005.07.03-08) H. Daimon, F. Matsui, F.Z. Guo, Y. Kato, M. Kudo, H. Matsuda “Imaging of 3-dimensional atomic arrangement by stereo atomscope” IVC-16 (Venice, Italy 2004.06.28-07.02) F. Matsui, F. Z. Guo, H. Daimon “Two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy for analysis of atomic and electronic structure” ACSIN-7 (Nara, Japan 2003.11.16-20) A. N. Hattori, M. Fujikado, S. Okamoto, K. Fukumoto, F. Z. Guo, F. Matsui, K. Nakatani, T. Matsushita, K. Hattori, H. Daimon “Atomic structure and magnetic property of Fe/Cu(001) by Stereoscopic photography and SMOKE” ACSIN-7 (Nara, Japan 2003.11.16-20) 【BEST POSTER賞受賞】F. Z. Guo, F. Matsui, M. Fujikado, T. Matsushita, H. Daimon “Stereo-photography of graphite atomic arrangements measured by display-type spherical mirror analyzer” ACSIN-7 (Nara, Japan 2003.11.16-20) K. Kataoka, K. Hattori, Y. Miyatake, F. Matsui, S. Nishino Takeda, H. Daimon “LEED and STM study of β-FeSi2 epilayers grown on Si(111)” ACSIN-7 (Nara, Japan 2003.11.16-20) M. Honda, F. Matsui, N. Masunaga T. Nishimura, S. Nishino Takeda, K. Hattori, H. Daimon “Chemisorption of amino acid on the Au surfeces” ACSIN-7 (Nara, Japan 2003.11.16-20) F. Matsui, H. Miyata, O. Rader, Y. Hamada, Y. Nakamura, K. Nakanishi, T. Wada, Y. Nozawa, H. Namba, H. Daimon “Two-Dimensional Photoelectron Spectroscopy for Atomic Orbital Analysis Cu(001) Fermi Surface and Valence Band” ICESS-9 (Uppsala, Sweden 2003.06.28-07.04) 【BEST POSTER賞受賞】F. Matsui, H. Miyata, O. Rader, Y. Hamada, Y. Nakamura, K. Nakanishi, K. Ogawa, H. Namba, H. Daimon “Atomic Orbital Analysis of Cu(001) Valence Band by Two-Dimensional Photoelectron Spectroscopy” Asia-Pacific Surface Interface Analysis Conference (Tokyo, Japan 2002.10.01-04) T. Nohno, F. Matsui, Y. Hamada, H. Matsumoto, S. Takeda, K. Hattori, H. Daimon “Development of two-dimensional display-type photoelectron spectrometer in the UPS region” Asia-Pacific Surface Interface Analysis Conference (Tokyo, Japan 2002.10.01-04) F. Matsui, H. Miyata, Y. Hori, H. Namba, H. Daimon “Three-dimensional band mapping and orbital analysis by linearly- Polarized light two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy” ICSRMS-3 (Singapore 2002.01.21-24) F. Matsui, H. Miyata, H. Namba, H. Daimon “Linearly polarized light two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy Band dispersion of Kish graphite in three-dimensions” ALC`01 (Nara, Japan 2001.11.11-14) 【BEST POSTER賞受賞】F. Matsui, Y. Hori, H. Totsuka, H. Miyata, T. Matsushita, H. Namba and H. Daimon “Photon energy dependence of umklapp scattered transitions and three-dimensional band dispersion of Kish graphite” VUV-VIII (Trieste, Italy 2001.07.23-27) F. Matsui, H.W. Yeom, K. Amemiya, K. Tono, T. Ohta “O2 molecular chemisorption states in the initial oxidation of the Si(111)77” ICSOS-6 (Vancouver, Canada 1999.07.26-30) F. Matsui, H.W. Yeom, A. Imanishi, K. Isawa, I. Matsuda, K. Tsuduki, K. Tono, T. Ohta “Adsorption of ethylene and benzene on the Si(001)2x1 surface studied by x-ray absorption and photoemission spectroscopies” IVC-14 (Birmingham, UK 1998.08.31-09.04) F. Matsui, H.W. Yeom, A. Imanishi, I. Matsuda, T. Ohta “Adsorption and thermal decomposition of acetylene on the Si(001)2x1 surface studied by NEXAFS and UPS” ICES-7 (Chiba, Japan 1997.09.08-12) 以下は本サイト@wikiのスポンサーの広告です。
https://w.atwiki.jp/asigami/pages/3907.html
曲名 アーティスト フォルダ 難易度 BPM NOTES/FREEZE(SHOCK) Surface Stessie A3 踊9 150 180/20 STREAM VOLTAGE AIR FREEZE CHAOS 33 37 5 43 7 踊譜面(9) / 激譜面(12) 譜面 動画 https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=DroZIwXLAGM (1P x3.0, NOTE) 解説 DDR A3稼働時追加楽曲(2022/03/17~)。 コメント コメント(感想など) 最新の10件を表示しています。コメント過去ログ